🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."